Difference between revisions of "NASAT"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Jonathan Suh (talk | contribs) (IQBT took over in 2018.) |
("until" was correct: IQBT took over in 2018, so HSAPQ ran it until their takeover—it's a right-half-open interval. However, this phrasing should be harder to misinterpret.) |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
− | The '''National All-Star Academic Tournament (NASAT)''' is run by [[IQBT|International Quiz Bowl Tournaments]], having been run by [[HSAPQ|High School Academic Pyramid Questions]] | + | The '''National All-Star Academic Tournament (NASAT)''' is run by [[IQBT|International Quiz Bowl Tournaments]], having been run by [[HSAPQ|High School Academic Pyramid Questions]] through 2017. It is a national tournament for state all-star teams, meaning that only one team from each state or Canadian province is allowed to enter in the tournament. The first occurrence of this tournament was held June 12-13, 2010 at [[Vanderbilt]] and was well-received. |
NASAT is not the first tournament to use state all-star teams, since that is done by [[PAC|PAC/NTAE]]. However, it is the first tournament using all-star teams to feature pyramidal questions and one-on-one matches. | NASAT is not the first tournament to use state all-star teams, since that is done by [[PAC|PAC/NTAE]]. However, it is the first tournament using all-star teams to feature pyramidal questions and one-on-one matches. |
Revision as of 14:24, 25 July 2019
The National All-Star Academic Tournament (NASAT) is run by International Quiz Bowl Tournaments, having been run by High School Academic Pyramid Questions through 2017. It is a national tournament for state all-star teams, meaning that only one team from each state or Canadian province is allowed to enter in the tournament. The first occurrence of this tournament was held June 12-13, 2010 at Vanderbilt and was well-received.
NASAT is not the first tournament to use state all-star teams, since that is done by PAC/NTAE. However, it is the first tournament using all-star teams to feature pyramidal questions and one-on-one matches.
In 2016, the field was opened to B teams.
Results by year
Results by team
State | 2010 | 2011 | 2012 | 2013 | 2014 | 2015 | 2016 | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | Played | Wins | Top 2s | Top 3s | Top 4s |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Alabama | 12 | 14 | 2 | ||||||||||||
Arizona | 13 | 1 | |||||||||||||
California | 7 | 4 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 4 | 3 | t-10th | 10 | 2 | 3 | 6 | 8 |
China | 25 | 1 | |||||||||||||
Connecticut | 23 | 1 | |||||||||||||
Delaware | 15 | 6 | 2 | ||||||||||||
District of Columbia | 6 | 7 | 2 | ||||||||||||
Florida | 9 | 22 | 2 | ||||||||||||
Georgia | 5 | 4 | 11 | 13 | 11 | 4 | 5 | 22 | 8 | 2 | |||||
Illinois | 3 | 2 | 2 | 6 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 10 | 4 | 7 | 9 | 9 |
Indiana | 13 | 12 | 12 | 3 | |||||||||||
Iowa | 22 | 1 | |||||||||||||
Kentucky | 10 | 8 | 11 | 7 | 11 | 8 | 9 | 21 | 23 | 8 | 10 | ||||
Maryland | 6 | 5 | 6 | 11 | 8 | 6 | 6 | ||||||||
Massachusetts | 16 | 1 | |||||||||||||
Michigan | 5 | 17 | 4 | 13 | 18 | 16 | 6 | 1 | |||||||
Minnesota | 12 | 13 | 2 | ||||||||||||
Missouri | 12 | 9 | 6 | 1 | 8 | 10 | 9 | 6 | 6 | 15 | 10 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
New Hampshire | 15 | 1 | |||||||||||||
New Jersey | 10 | 8 | 10 | 4 | 5 | 16 | 4 | 7 | 2 | ||||||
New York | 9 | 3 | 9 | 14 | 6 | 2 | t-10th | 7 | 1 | 2 | 2 | ||||
Nevada | 27 | 1 | |||||||||||||
North Carolina | 7 | 15 | 2 | ||||||||||||
Ohio | 8 | 3 | 9 | 4 | 7 | 7 | 3 | 7 | 3 | 2 | 10 | 1 | 4 | 5 | |
Oklahoma | 14 | 12 | 19 | 3 | |||||||||||
Pennsylvania | 1 | 9 | 5 | 9 | 5 | 12 | 6 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | ||||
South Carolina | 2 | 12 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | |||||||||
Tennessee | 11 | 10 | 6 | 7 | 4 | ||||||||||
Texas | 5 | 1 | 5 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 7 | 2 | 3 | 5 | 5 | |||
Vermont | 16 | 1 | |||||||||||||
Virginia | 4 | 10 | 8 | 6 | 2 | 8 | 2 | 7 | 8 | 2 | 2 | 3 |
NOTE: This table is through 2019.