Difference between revisions of "Talk:2013-14 HSQBRank"

From QBWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
m
Line 253: Line 253:
 
:To be quite honest, this entire table is just one huge mess. Is it really necessary to track the top 10 for each release? I'm going to just post the current top 10 (or 25) while providing links to previous rankings for the year. (At least for now, perhaps I or someone else will come up with a more efficient solution later.) [[User:Alex Liu|Alex Liu]] ([[User talk:Alex Liu|talk]]) 18:22, 30 November 2013 (PST)
 
:To be quite honest, this entire table is just one huge mess. Is it really necessary to track the top 10 for each release? I'm going to just post the current top 10 (or 25) while providing links to previous rankings for the year. (At least for now, perhaps I or someone else will come up with a more efficient solution later.) [[User:Alex Liu|Alex Liu]] ([[User talk:Alex Liu|talk]]) 18:22, 30 November 2013 (PST)
 
:What in the world was the bottom row supposed to be, anyway? [[User:Alex Liu|Alex Liu]] ([[User talk:Alex Liu|talk]]) 18:33, 30 November 2013 (PST)
 
:What in the world was the bottom row supposed to be, anyway? [[User:Alex Liu|Alex Liu]] ([[User talk:Alex Liu|talk]]) 18:33, 30 November 2013 (PST)
 +
 +
Since people pay attention to the rankings I figured they'd also be interested ranking changes throughout the year. Granted, some of the more dramatic changes in ranking can be attributed to a top player or team playing a tournament for the first time than actual quizbowl gameplay related matters. I agree it does seem somewhat cluttered but reducing the font size has helped. The bottom row is supposed to track teams entering and exiting the top 25 and it contains a bunch of wikitex I didn't bother to delete. For the record the table was [[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2013%E2%80%9314_NCAA_Division_I_men%27s_basketball_rankings | taken from wikipedia]] once again.--[[User:Zachary Yan|Zachary Yan]] ([[User talk:Zachary Yan|talk]]) 22:29, 30 November 2013 (PST)

Revision as of 01:29, 1 December 2013

The table

Here's the table in blank slate format --Zachary Yan (talk) 17:59, 30 November 2013 (PST)


Preseason ranking
Ranking #1
Ranking #2
Ranking #3
Ranking #4
Ranking #5
Ranking #6
Ranking #7
Ranking #8
1. 1.
2. 2.
3. 3.
4. 4.
5. 5.
6. 6.
7. 7.
8. 8.
9. 9.
10. 10.
Dropped:
None
Dropped:
None
Dropped:
None
Dropped:
None
Dropped:
None
Dropped:
None
Dropped:
None
Dropped:
None
Dropped:
None
Dropped:
None
Dropped:
None
Dropped:
None
Dropped:
None
Dropped:
None
Dropped:
None
Dropped:
None
Dropped:
None
Dropped:
None
Dropped:
None
To be quite honest, this entire table is just one huge mess. Is it really necessary to track the top 10 for each release? I'm going to just post the current top 10 (or 25) while providing links to previous rankings for the year. (At least for now, perhaps I or someone else will come up with a more efficient solution later.) Alex Liu (talk) 18:22, 30 November 2013 (PST)
What in the world was the bottom row supposed to be, anyway? Alex Liu (talk) 18:33, 30 November 2013 (PST)

Since people pay attention to the rankings I figured they'd also be interested ranking changes throughout the year. Granted, some of the more dramatic changes in ranking can be attributed to a top player or team playing a tournament for the first time than actual quizbowl gameplay related matters. I agree it does seem somewhat cluttered but reducing the font size has helped. The bottom row is supposed to track teams entering and exiting the top 25 and it contains a bunch of wikitex I didn't bother to delete. For the record the table was [| taken from wikipedia] once again.--Zachary Yan (talk) 22:29, 30 November 2013 (PST)