Difference between revisions of "Talk:2021 HSNCT"
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
[[Em Gunter]] 29/06/21 | [[Em Gunter]] 29/06/21 | ||
| − | I could delete the paragraph about the tournament cost; though there was quite a bit of discussion about it on the HS discord, it wasn't really an "issue" at the end of the day. The botched protest communication was an important issue though, and should stay up (at the very least, to warn future tournaments not to repeat this mistake). | + | I could delete the paragraph about the tournament cost; though there was quite a bit of discussion about it on the HS discord, it wasn't really an "issue" at the end of the day. The botched protest communication was an important issue though, and should stay up (at the very least, to warn future tournaments not to repeat this mistake). I did edit the latter to have a less critical tone. |
[[User:Eric Yin|Eric Yin]] ([[User talk:Eric Yin|talk]]) 16:29, 29 June 2021 (CDT) | [[User:Eric Yin|Eric Yin]] ([[User talk:Eric Yin|talk]]) 16:29, 29 June 2021 (CDT) | ||
Revision as of 16:29, 29 June 2021
Would it be better to keep the page like this (forum thread and grogerranks links as "references") or to have each external link be embedded in the text (like most other pages on this wiki)? I think it looks best to have it all one way or the other
Eric Yin (talk) 23:45, 6 June 2021 (CDT)
Is there a reason that the issues section of this page is so petty? It seems like most of it is trying to take cheap shots at NAQT.
Em Gunter 29/06/21
I could delete the paragraph about the tournament cost; though there was quite a bit of discussion about it on the HS discord, it wasn't really an "issue" at the end of the day. The botched protest communication was an important issue though, and should stay up (at the very least, to warn future tournaments not to repeat this mistake). I did edit the latter to have a less critical tone. Eric Yin (talk) 16:29, 29 June 2021 (CDT)