Difference between revisions of "Talk:HSNCT and its Problems"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Created page with "NAQT did not change its timing rules ~~~~") |
Matt Weiner (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
NAQT did not change its timing rules [[User:Jonah Greenthal|Jonah]] ([[User talk:Jonah Greenthal|talk]]) 14:12, 6 July 2021 (CDT) | NAQT did not change its timing rules [[User:Jonah Greenthal|Jonah]] ([[User talk:Jonah Greenthal|talk]]) 14:12, 6 July 2021 (CDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | I don't really understand the recent trend of making articles that just summarize HSQB threads when people can read the HSQB threads. If someone wants to write a good piece on like "criticism of the HSNCT" and look at what issues people have raised over time and how NAQT has responded to those issues, with cites to various threads etc., that might make sense, but I don't see what's added by pages like this one, the haircut thread page, or the page on Tuhin's posts other than a new opportunity for people to get upset and argue about the original issue in the edit summaries and the talk page. [[User:Matt Weiner|Matt Weiner]] ([[User talk:Matt Weiner|talk]]) 15:04, 6 July 2021 (CDT) | ||
Revision as of 15:04, 6 July 2021
NAQT did not change its timing rules Jonah (talk) 14:12, 6 July 2021 (CDT)
I don't really understand the recent trend of making articles that just summarize HSQB threads when people can read the HSQB threads. If someone wants to write a good piece on like "criticism of the HSNCT" and look at what issues people have raised over time and how NAQT has responded to those issues, with cites to various threads etc., that might make sense, but I don't see what's added by pages like this one, the haircut thread page, or the page on Tuhin's posts other than a new opportunity for people to get upset and argue about the original issue in the edit summaries and the talk page. Matt Weiner (talk) 15:04, 6 July 2021 (CDT)