For various reasons, I'd like to know what people think about
questions that are written word-for-word out of a non-primary
reference source (web or otherwise). During the last major discussion
of plagiarism that I can recall (Beall-related), I was surprised to
see that the prevailing opinion seemed to be that one should expect
to see a lot of questions that were evidently written straight out of
a reference source.
Is this still the general opinion? (For that matter, was it ever?)
Thanks,
Susan
University of Chicago