Re: 2003 NAQT ICT to be held in Los Angeles: A Bet

To Adam:

<<<<<<<<<<>>>>>>>>>
Anyway, while I think it is fair to hold the ICT in LA, economically, 
some teams like Sudheer's Illini (and especially teams from farther 
east) will find it difficult to pay for transcontinental flight. 
Further, it's probably not wise to book a supersaver flight until you 
qualify (unless you know you are a Top 10-15 team).
<<<<<<<<<>>>>>>>>>>

A:  Fly anyways and play standby. [see WashU _at_ 2000 BU]

B:  You self-answer your argument by stating that not enough teams 
will sign up.

C:  Any flight out of Boston/LaGuardia/Philly is expensive to any 
other location in the US not served by Southwest, regardless of 
transcontinental nature.


Matt writes:

<<<<<<<<<<>>>>>>>>>
Southwest flies only to selected large cities. The
average college town, and even such major cities as
Boston, need to fly with a full-fare airline. So far
it's been made known that Princeton, Illinois, and
Harvard will have enormous difficulties getting to the
event.
<<<<<<<<<<>>>>>>>>>

A:  Drive to a southwest-served city like Hartford, BWI, or
Long Island, then fly. [see WashU STL-->Hartford, ICT 2000]

B:  Flying out of Boston/other east coast is inherently expensive 
to ANYWHERE it's not served by Southwest/"your favorite low
cost carrier".  This means ICT's should never be hosted in the 
deep south, southwest, or upper midwest because it takes too 
long to drive there for poor Cornell or Penn State.

C:  Southwest isn't the only low-cost alternative.

D:  Fundraise or host more tournaments.

<<<<<<<<<<>>>>>>>>>
I did a quick check of prices from several major
Eastern air hubs. Los Angeles is on average $150 more
expensive per person than a central city such as
Chicago or St. Louis. The situation is more severe for
teams in less populous areas.
<<<<<<<<<<<<>>>>>>>>>>>>>

A:  Airfares now aren't always the lowest airfares available; wait 
for a sale.

B:  Fundraise or host more tournaments.


To Mysterious Packet_Ops:

A) You beg the question that Southwest Airlines flies to all the 
major cities from which college teams will be leaving. Amazing as it 
may sound, the majority of Southwest Airlines cities are found in the 
South and in the West. A quick look at a map of SOuthwest cities 
(<http://www.iflyswa.com/travel_center/routemap.html>) shows such 
major cities as Boston, New York, Pittsburgh, Philadelphia, Newark, 
Atlanta, and Charleston aren't even served by Southwest. A lot of 
colleges are located around area of those cities and won't have this 
wondrous, affordable option you're talking about. Hell, I bet a some 
teams will have trouble finding a flight that goes both in and out of 
LAX. In our specific case, nearly every ticket option I looked at on 
numerous discount flight plan websites required us to go LAX one way 
and SNA (John Wayne airport... that's in Orange County... I've driven 
from L.A. to Orange County many times before... that's a very long 
and tedious drive). So seeing as how Southwest doesn't even serve a 
large host of major cities, especially in the east, that effectively 
kills your point.
<<<<<<<<<<<>>>>>>>>>>>>

A:  Airfares now aren't always the lowest airfares available; wait 
for a sale.

B:  You beg the question that Southwest is the only low cost carrier 
out there.

C:  Drive to a Southwest served location. [can't do anything about 
Charleston :-(]

D:  Fundraise or host tournaments.

E:  Fly multiple cheap airlines.

F:  Call your travel agent if you have problems.

G:  In general, please get more creative.


<<<<<<<<<<<<<>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
B) The return flight is made easier for west coast schools because 
they at least gain 3 hours back due to time zone changes, as opposed 
to all the east coast schools, who will lose an extra 3 hours of time 
in addition to the large amount of travel time required. When the 
teams are in L.A. they will pretty much have to conform to the 
tournament's Pacific Time schedule, nullifying any hours saved from 
the time zone change on the flight to L.A. People have other things 
to do too, and 3 hours of time is not an insignificant amount. Some 
of the flights I quoted in my initial search efforts actually arrived 
early Monday morning, and for people who have class/work Monday that 
is unacceptable, let alone considering the hassle it would be to find 
affordable transportation home from the airport when arriving at such 
late hours.
<<<<<<<<<<<>>>>>>>>>>

I'm sorry if you can't "conform" to the west coast schedule, and that 
you can't waste three hours of time.  I'm sure we all aren't 
procrastinators at one point or the other; would you consider not 
going to your favorite tournament because of a loss of three hours?  
Well, I guess I just won't attend that party on Thursday...

In my opinion, after flying many many places for med school 
interviews, quiz bowl & debate tournaments, and conferences, travel 
days are not days to plan to do much of anything, going to any 
destination regardless of coast.  I don't know what experiences 
you've had, but I guess it varies from person to person. You're 
entitled to your own opinion.

This ends my two cents on the matter.  I don't have time to answer 
anything anymore, so I hereby concede all arguments [that includes 
you Matt].

Yours,

Jason Paik
who won't be attending the ICT or the SCT because he has no team

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0: Sat 12 Feb 2022 12:30:46 AM EST EST