Re: COTKU -- general comments

I know the bonus you're talking about. Those three sentences a piece 
could have been trimmed to three words total: Rhodes, Olympia, Babylon

--- In quizbowl_at_y..., jakea2 <no_reply_at_y...> wrote:
> 
> I also don't want to be overly critical.  I know it was the first 
> tournament of the year.  I know that it is absolutely impossible to 
> write a packet that is both fair and worthwhile for a field that 
has 
> entirely novice teams on one end and Raj and Kelly on the other.  
> That being said, however, there were several problems.  The tossups 
> weren't too bad, but many of the boni were far too long or far too 
> easy, or both.  There was one in the first playoff round that had 
> several sentences on the 7 wonders, and they weren't even the HARD 
> wonders.  I don't want to criticize Charlie's editing too much, I 
> know he was also editing the high school tournament.  But 
difficulty 
> was an issue, and as Stephen pointed out, packets were mostly 
written 
> one way or the other.  Our packet was written for a Div I field.  
> Most of the others seemed to be aimed at Div II, with some 
questions 
> even feeling like HS.  There isn't much that can be done about the 
> long boni except just learning how to write.  However, for the 
> difficulty, I tend to think that if there are separate divisions, 
> there should be separate packets.  I know it's extra work for all 
> involved, but it would solve the problem and make tournaments more 
> enjoyable.  It would also handle some of the issues being discussed 
> over in the "Future of QB" thread.  Anyway, just my thoughts.  
> 
> -Jake

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0: Sat 12 Feb 2022 12:30:46 AM EST EST