Re: COTKU -- general comments


I also don't want to be overly critical.  I know it was the first 
tournament of the year.  I know that it is absolutely impossible to 
write a packet that is both fair and worthwhile for a field that has 
entirely novice teams on one end and Raj and Kelly on the other.  
That being said, however, there were several problems.  The tossups 
weren't too bad, but many of the boni were far too long or far too 
easy, or both.  There was one in the first playoff round that had 
several sentences on the 7 wonders, and they weren't even the HARD 
wonders.  I don't want to criticize Charlie's editing too much, I 
know he was also editing the high school tournament.  But difficulty 
was an issue, and as Stephen pointed out, packets were mostly written 
one way or the other.  Our packet was written for a Div I field.  
Most of the others seemed to be aimed at Div II, with some questions 
even feeling like HS.  There isn't much that can be done about the 
long boni except just learning how to write.  However, for the 
difficulty, I tend to think that if there are separate divisions, 
there should be separate packets.  I know it's extra work for all 
involved, but it would solve the problem and make tournaments more 
enjoyable.  It would also handle some of the issues being discussed 
over in the "Future of QB" thread.  Anyway, just my thoughts.  

-Jake

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0: Sat 12 Feb 2022 12:30:46 AM EST EST