Re: COTKU -- general comments

--- In quizbowl_at_y..., jakea2 <no_reply_at_y...> wrote:
{snip}

> However, for the 
> difficulty, I tend to think that if there are separate divisions, 
> there should be separate packets.  I know it's extra work for all 
> involved, but it would solve the problem and make tournaments more 
> enjoyable.  It would also handle some of the issues being discussed 
> over in the "Future of QB" thread.  Anyway, just my thoughts.  

I've only ever seen one tournament where that was done, at NAQT 
Sectionals three years ago.  And yes, it's a great idea.  And no, it 
wouldn't require 100% separate questions; many tossups are appropriate 
for both as is, and it would be possible to take a hard bonus and 
write a softer version of it for D II, and vice versa.  But again, 
this assumes (a) enough quality raw material and (b) getting it in 
time.  I may try something along those lines for the Moon Pie in 
April; it'll be more feasible then because all these freshmen we saw 
Saturday will have enough experience to write at least some usable 
questions.  But I doubt if there'll ever be a fall tournament that 
gets enough good material to pull that off.

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0: Sat 12 Feb 2022 12:30:46 AM EST EST