Re: Panasonic critique

Tom wrote, "At least back in 1998, Texas won the
Panasonic tournament. Obviously many of the teams that I
talked to had "sour grapes" complex when they said that
clearly Maryland played "desperate" down the stretch,
while Texas wound up getting less than 4 15-pt
questions to win the game (if I recall that correctly). I
don't discount Klein Forest winning Panasonic; they
clearly played that game the best in the championship
round. But many coaches felt a bit dissatisfied that a
team can really win a quiz bowl tournament without
being the best or most aggressive on the buzzer (i.e.,
win tossup questions). That is antithetical to the
nature of qb as most of us play it."

It was 1997
and it was Klein HS (ie Klein, TX)that won Panasonic
but you are absolutely right Tom. Not only did they
win in the final because of Maryland's mistakes, the
same thing happened in the semifinals.

I was
lucky enough to be competing (ok, in truth I did more
watching than playing) at PAC that year and we were even
luckier to make the semifinals. In our group we had
Klein, Detroit Catholic Central, NC School of Math and
Science and all-star teams from Minnesota and Missouri.
My memory is starting to fade on me, but if I recall
correctly Missouri had a big lead going into the final
round with Minnesota second and Texas third. Texas
played well in the final round, but they only reached
the championship (top two advance) because Missouri
self-destructed in the final round.

It is my opinion that
the the combination of the severe penalty for
incorrect answers (equal to the reward for correct answers)
and the multiple teams playing at once really doctors
the results. I'm totally unconviced about
competitions were on multiple choice match questions teams
have to take a 50/50 guess after the second clue just
to get a chance to answer. I also agree with Tom
that the random pairings (not to mention allowing
all-star teams, but don't get me started there) makes for
wildly unusual results. I like the style of the games
and for the most part the questions are good (I do
agree with Darren about the ridiculousness of their
rules concerning multiple choice questions)but it does
seem rather insane than last year you can end up with
a Maryland, South Carolina, State College and P.L.
Dunbar all in the same semifinal round.

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0: Sat 12 Feb 2022 12:30:42 AM EST EST