> Obviously, it is completely a matter of perspective whether or not
> Mt.
> Townsend should be asked or not, but being the author of this
> particular bonus, I feel a certain need to defend it, especially
> since
> it's been singled out from among the hundreds of bonuses in the
set.
I hope I didn't make it sound as though I was picking on anyone.
This was just the one question that jumped out at me immediately;
there were many others as well.
> "Importance" is certainly a silly term to throw around when
talking
> about physical geography, at least in this case, since Kosciusko
and
> Townsend are both basically big lumps of rock.
I don't think I used the word "importance" in my previous post. I
didn't mean to imply that Townsend was not important or somehow
inferior to Kosciusko, since I don't know enough geography to know
what is and what isn't important. However, when someone who is
considered more or less of an expert (or as much of an expert as any
qb player can be) on the subject draws a blank on it, it gives me
pause. In any case, second highest mountains are rarely asked about
precisely for the reason that they are far, far less well known than
the highest mountain in a given range.
Anyway, I want to stress again that I didn't mean to pick on your
question, it's just the one I happened to think of first.