Night of the Living Computation Bonus!

Just to throw my two cents into a whole bunch of recent threads all at 
once (so forgive me if I forget your names)...

1) Canon expansion: Although I don't consider myself qualified and/or 
motivated to expand the canon in most subjects, there is one exception: 
music theory.  As it is, the only stuff that consistently gets asked is 
musical forms (esp. fugue and aria).  For example, I remember exactly 
one and a third music theory questions from Yale's (excellent) 
tournament: a chord types question that I wrote.  (The "third" was a 
part of a Rameau tossup that mentioned his theory treatise Traite de 
l'harmonie...)  I must say that I appreciate some recent efforts of 
NAQT (Have I said too much? I'm sorry.), but seeing how music theory is 
as much a part of the study of music as history, more can (and should) 
be done.  Personally, I'd like to see more music period, but that's 
just me.

And of course, music theoreticians are seldom (if at all) asked about 
(what I wouldn't do to hear a Heinrich Schenker tossup)... 

BTW, I'd positively salivate if I were to play on that Sunshine State 
packet, though I think I'd have the good sense not to *write* (or edit) 
something like that.


2) Bonus formats:  I think I'll join with the chorus of people in 
saying that computation boni (and tossups, for that matter) are wholly 
inappropriate for collegiate play...

However, I must take exception at the recent trends to curtail certain  
bonus formats such as the 5-10-15 and 30-20-10 (though I recognize that 
both should be used in moderation.) While the merits of putting 
impossibly hard questions in the 15 are debatable at best, the fact 
remains that the 5-10-15 serves as a refreshing change of pace from the 
monotonous, drab, boring, and vastly overused 10-10-10.  Many recent 
packets I've heard had 90% or more 10-10-10s. Variety is the spice of 
both life and bonus formats.

By the way, why do people seem to be souring on the 30-20-10?  It seems 
like a sound format to me.  I don't recall a single instance of a 30-
20-10 at ACF Regionals (though I probably shouldn't complain, since our 
team didn't submit a packet)...

And yes, the 15-15 is a bad format, for reasons so eloquently cited in 
an earlier post.


3) the poll: I didn't vote, though if I had, I would definitely not 
have called Samer worst anything.  Yes, there were delays, and a few of 
the questions were sketchy (the visual language id bonus- a 10-10-10, 
BTW- comes to mind), but bringing together sixty-odd teams and twenty 
or so packets from oodles of sources is an impressive feat, and it's a 
credit to Samer and his staff that it went as well as it did.  It 
boggles the mind to think of all that must go into running Penn Bowl...


4) undergrad trash and chronology:  As a member of a permanently all-
undergrad team, I have to thank Princeton for putting on this 
tournament.  My teammates have come to hate traditional trash tourneys, 
with the rampant proliferation of dinosaurs: it's frankly no fun being 
a team of young'n's routinely getting your ass kicked by the likes of 
Nam and Kidder.  (My teammates also lament the recent push away from 
geek trash, which is the specialty of everyone but Jeff, but that's 
another potato.)  While I, a *seventeen* year old, personally know far 
more about the sixties (and earlier, if you're talking pro football) 
then the eighties (or, in some respects, even the nineties), I 
attribute this simply to being a bad trash player.  Princeton, you're 
doing the circuit a great service, and don't let anyone tell you 
otherwise (though, as mentioned before, we could do without the strict 
limits on geek trash).


5) DeJesus' statskeeping:  I actually tried something like that for 
SNEWT, before giving up halfway through when I realized I din't have 
the time.  I think I still have the scoresheets somewhere...

6) To the third-place finisher of ACF Detox:  While I applaud you on 
choosing just about the best team name possible, I'm afraid you bungled 
it a little bit: the quote is actually, "Oh No!  I think you shanked my 
Jengaship!"


Chris

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0: Sat 12 Feb 2022 12:30:46 AM EST EST