Re: Tournament Naming

> However, most of the 
> women I know who have turned away from the game have done so less 
for 
> reasons like this and more because they have experienced some 
direct, 
> overt sexism, like male captains who won't take them seriously, 
won't 
> consult them on bonuses but _will_ defer to all the males on the 
team . . .


I think the overarching problem isn't that it's dominated by men, but 
that there's a disproportionate number of quiz bowl people (of both 
genders) with poor social skills, or people who are just jerks. I'm 
not sure why. Perhaps it's that those who are attracted to the game 
are used to being the best at all things academic, which leads to a 
bunch of big egos floating around. Whatever the reason, nobody enjoys 
playing with people who have difficult personalities, and road trips 
on Saturdays mean that you not only have to play with them, you have 
to spend hours with them in the car, sleep in the same hotel room... 
it's easy to see why you'd just drop out altogether. I'm not denying 
that there are problems with sexism in quiz bowl. It does exist. But 
that problem is added to, or even exacerbated by, players who aren't 
good at getting along with others.

Loyola's team has always been evenly balanced between men and women, 
and I've personally never experienced a problem within my own team 
with the men shutting the women out. I would chalk that up to 
everyone being friends (or at the least, friendly) with each other 
and also knowing their own strengths and limitations. I would suggest 
that if male quiz bowlers notice this happening on their team, to 
talk about it with the offender and see if it can't get ironed out 
that way instead of growing into a power struggle during tournaments 
or women dropping out. 

To women who have been shut out- call the offender out on it. Take 
him (or her) aside after the round and ask, "Are you not taking input 
from me because I'm female?" It might be other things- maybe gut 
instinct said to go with something else, or two other team members 
agreed on a different answer. Even if it is "yes, because you're a 
girl," it's going to have to be the biggest ass in the world who 
would freely admit to it. If that's the case, at least it'll be 
openly known that the discrimination has been noticed and will be 
watched for. But you've got to stand up for yourself and call them 
out on it. If the differences can't be negotiated, recruit three 
friends and form your own team, or a team-within-the-bigger team, and 
play with them regularly.

Every female player we've had on our team is someone I know would 
refuse to be intimidated and speak up- in any situation- and I'm glad 
for it. Quiz Bowl is a more easily leveled playing field than 
other "good ol' boy" clubs. You don't have to be bigger or stronger 
(and even if you did, there's not a whole lot of other players that I 
can't see us beating in a fistfight). Eventually, the only result of 
ignoring input from strong female (or male) players is going to be 
that your own team's scores are hurt; that the other teams in the 
room will witness the repeated stupidity of missing out on correct 
answers; and that, over time, the individual stats will (unless she 
AND her teammates are being shut out in toss-ups by a stronger player 
on the team) reflect the strength of the overlooked player.

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0: Sat 12 Feb 2022 12:30:47 AM EST EST