Though I just messed up that post, I was referring mainly to the overabundance of hockey questions in NAQT by the way. Sure the same writers who pollute SCT/ICT with hockey filler (and feel compelled to compare QB to NHL any time they are in a debate) are also heavily responsible for many of the bad questions people complain about, but this time I was being more specific. --- In quizbowl_at_yahoogroups.com, qbtunagirl <no_reply_at_y...> wrote: > > > Another premise well worth strong disagreement. Perhaps the 2003 > > > Detroit Red Wings really ought to have been declared NHL champions > > > based on their regular season performance, rather than the travesty > > > of seeing them swept in the playoffs by a clearly inferior team. > > Or > > > perhaps not. > > > > Perhaps hockey has nothing to do with quiz bowl. Or perhaps not. > > Seriously, the hockey analogy is lame. It's bad enough that NAQT > players have to put up with a disproportionate amount of crappy bad > questions because a few lame writers (who, sadly, are among the more > prolific writers) think it's cool to subject them repeatedly to their > personal whims. I guess it's not as bad as a certain circuit member > who flooded every one of his packets with questions on a certain > terrible Swedish band and a certain Olympic non sport followed only by > pedophiles and homosexuals, but still.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0: Sat 12 Feb 2022 12:30:47 AM EST EST