Re: [quizbowl] HBCU's [was: Re: Gender/race disparity)

Disclaimer: I'm not involved in the Honda Classic or in an 
HBCU-sponsored quizbowl team, and I'll gladly defer in this discussion 
to anyone who is.  However, I think I've had more direct contact with 
HCASC programs than most of us in this group, so these comments aren't 
purely speculation on my part...

bucktowntiger wrote (in part):

> On HCASC segregation, let everyone play with the big boys, already! 
> Of course, Howard, Morehouse, and Florida A&M would argue that they
> *are* the big boys, but could they beat Michigan or Chicago or
> Berkeley?  Those are matchups we very well may never see.  The
> question is:  is there a legitimate reason for the separate
> competitions?  HCASC seems a lot like the "National Achievement
> Scholar" thing with the easier questions (judging on the non-African-
> American-question difficulty, HCASC lies somewhere between CBI
> Intramurals and CBI Regionals, tending towards Intramurals).  Also,
> qualification for HCASC is based not on regional or other play, but
> instead on how soon the schools register.  Also, see the fact that
> teams eligible for HCASC may participate in either HCASC or College
> Bowl, but not both.  If HCASC teams played regular College Bowl, this
> would increase the diversity of College Bowl more than having
> separate competitions.  Of course, the reason could be that the
> HBCU's don't want to compete with the non-HBCU's, but I doubt this is
> the case.  If I attended an HBCU and found out about the circuit,
> then I would have made every effort to start a circuit program. 
> Maybe that's just me.
>
> --Josh, P. t. altaica
>
    As you probably know, CBCI removed the official barrier to HCASC 
teams' participation on the circuit was removed four years ago.  Since 
then, I've made a concerted effort to bring historically black colleges 
and universities to UTC's tournaments, with moderate success.  Four 
schools have sent teams to date (with two more registered for Sword Bowl 
next month), and three of those have come back for more.  Competitive?  
They were every bit as competitive as similarly inexperienced teams 
we've seen from other four-year schools, or two-year schools from 
Alabama who'd played solely on the Alabama junior college circuit (a 
similar level of difficulty to CBCI/HCASC.)  Morehouse came within one 
win of making the playoffs at Sword Bowl in their first appearance at a 
UTC tournament.  Morehouse also won the HCASC that year and the next, 
and their players told other HCASC players that going to Sword Bowl and 
NAQT Sectionals definitely helped them develop their game.

    When you talk to coaches of Honda teams, you'll find the obstacles 
to greater circuit participation are mostly the same ones you hear from 
non-HBCU's: money and time.  Like so many of our circuit teams, most 
Honda teams don't get enough school funding for additional tournaments.  
Tennessee State raises money the same way many of us do, by holding a 
high school tournament; the others often pay out of pocket for 
tournaments or practice questions (we've had almost a dozen HBCU's order 
practice sets from us.)  Also, the students on the HCASC teams are often 
high achievers with other campus activities that keep their schedules 
filled, making it hard to get a team together on a given weekend.  Sound 
familiar?

    There are also issues of continuity, just like the ones circuit 
four-year schools face.  You know the story: the core of a team 
graduates, and no one else steps in, so the school quietly disappears 
for a few years.  Some HCASC teams have a stable coaching situation and 
can maintain their program, but coaches and institutional contacts do 
change frequently.

    Aside from the now-discarded rule prohibiting HCASC teams from 
independent tournament play, I've heard of only one obstacle unique to 
the HBCU's.  This is second-hand information, but I've been told by two 
coaches that coaches of other HCASC teams with even less funding have 
objected to allowing participation in other tournaments.  They say it's 
not fair that some schools go to competitions not everyone can afford.  
In fact, I've heard that that was one of the main reasons behind the 
CBCI policy in the first place, though I've never heard that from CBCI.

    Ultimately, there are lots of schools -- not just HBCU's, but 
certainly including them -- that we should be recruiting for circuit 
tournaments.  HCASC teams, like once-a-year CBCI teams, are among the 
most promising targets because they already have a team and some form of 
leadership in place.  If you run a tournament and are serious about 
broadening participation, and you want some pointers, let me know and 
I'll share a few thoughts with you.

-- 
******************************************************************
Charlie Steinhice                 "Come, come!  Why, they couldn't
Chattanooga, TN	                  hit an elephant at this dist..."
(center of the known universe)              --  Gen. John Sedgwick
   
******************************************************************

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0: Sat 12 Feb 2022 12:30:47 AM EST EST