"Covert" revision of D2 elligibility rules

While looking at the stats from the West Coast SCT, I noticed that
UCLA put up some dominating numbers in the D2 bracket.  Further
examination of individual stats showed that the tandem of Charles
Meigs and Matthew Sherman put up some very strong stats against the D2
competition... just like they did when they played D2 last year at ICT
2003, where Mr. Meigs was also the leading scorer.

In its official elligibility rules, NAQT affords D2 status to players
who "Prior to the current competition year, [] have never played on a
Sectionals team that qualified for the Intercollegiate Championship
Tournament nor played at the Intercollegiate Championship Tournament
at either the Division II or Division I levels."  Even in its most
recent official exception, NAQT states "Players on teams... remain
Division II ineligible, as do all teams that attended the ICT,
regardless of the date of their invitation."  Under the public and
official rules on D2 elligbility, UCLA's team was inelligible to play
in D2 and broke the rules by playing.

When this issue came up on the hsquizbowl.org message board, several
UCLA members claimed that NAQT had, in private, offered UCLA's 2003 D2
team an special exemption to elligbility rules whereas they could play
in ICT 2003 and still retain their D2 elligbility.  I follow the scene
pretty regularly and correspond often with several NAQT members, yet I
have never heard anything of the sort.

If what UCLA is saying is true, however, then NAQT needs to do some
serious explaining, namely why they would grant such an arbitrary and
fundamentally contradictory exemption, and why they would keep it a
secret that even the teams who would be paying money to compete
against UCLA would not be aware of?  If NAQT had gone to the trouble
of announcing and publicizing other exceptions to their elligbility
rules, why would they keep this case a secret?

I just wanted to bring this issue to light, because D2 elligbility is
always a spark of controversy and this issue seems especially serious.

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0: Sat 12 Feb 2022 12:30:47 AM EST EST