recounts, precedents, CT aflame...

Well, after having a third class in two days
essentially shut down and turned into a one hour, fifteen
minute forum on the election, a few things have come up
which may be relevant.
As far as the Buchanan/Gore
votes, what has been thrown around in class is that
apparently, since the 1996 election, the number of registered
Independent (read "potentially Buchanan") voters throughout
Florida has increased tremendously. Thus, it's actually
*not* inconceivable that the Buchanan votes are
actually "real".
According to MSNBC as of about five
minutes ago, although in Florida, there *is* a precedent
for no revotes, there ARE such precedents in other
states.
Third point/question people are now trying to figure
out: just WHAT is the controlling legal authority in
the case?

"At what point do we stop looking
under every Bush for any irregularity?" [capitalization
is mine]; arguably a Freudian slip on the part of
one of the MSNBC people, asking a question of a Bush
Campaign person

And perhaps we all at least should
be thankful that had this been a country *other*
than America, all those pretty Palm Beach mansions
would now be cruise missile magnets, and we'd have an
armored corps making its way slowly through New England
:-)

 - Mikhail
[who has come back into the real
world after a month off-grid]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0: Sat 12 Feb 2022 12:30:43 AM EST EST