Re: Precedent against recount

Stuff like this sounds pretty shrill and partisan
to me. 

"Democrats in the county designed the
ballot. The notified everyone of it. They used it in the
election. Now, when the election doesn't go their way, they
backtrack? They put forward the ballot, knowing everyone
would rely on it. Now they've got to suck it up and
move on."
"But it's ok and classy for Gore to
promise to fight this forever and all this nonsense? I
would hope Gore would want to be President by playing
by the rules, not bending them. Which is what he is
trying to do right now."

I support the Gore
camp's efforts to try to determine whom Florida actually
favors. I think it's better that we have maybe a week of
confusion than four years of the wrong person in the White
House. Unfortunately I could not find the articles today
to quote from, but I remember reading in several
places that high ranking people in the Bush campaign,
like Evans, were already talking about trying to get
the electoral college to go their way if they only
won the popular vote. They were planning on waging a
radio war basically. In my mind, that's really not
playing by the rules. At least Gore is just asking for
careful recounts and possibly a new election in one
county. He says he will abide by the electoral college's
choice, no matter what. [Does anyone else remember
reading what I read about getting electors to switch? I
swear I am not making that up]

According to the
Wash Post, the Gore camp does have a basis for
challenging the PBC results, as FL election law is very
broad. 

"Florida law offers aggrieved candidates
and voters broad opportunities to challenge the
results of elections. The relevant state Supreme Court
case, a 1998 opinion . . . says election results can be
thrown out, even without evidence of fraud or
intentional misconduct by election officials, if there is
'reasonable doubt' about whether the officially certified
results 'expressed the will of the voters.'

"The
court left open, however, the issue that is critical in
this situation--what remedy courts should impose in
such
cases."
<a href=http://washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A57142-2000Nov9.html target=new>http://washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A57142-2000Nov9.html</a>

About Palm Beach County, even Pat Buchanan says those
votes weren't his. I think Gore has the right to try to
correct an accident. I think not being careful about
election results would be more a harm to our country and
democracy than being silent.

<a href=http://madison.hss.cmu.edu/ target=new>http://madison.hss.cmu.edu/</a> [a PBCstat analysis]

If Bush winds up
becoming president I wonder if he'll make an effort to
reach out to the accidental Buchanan voters of Palm
Beach County or just carry on as if he were meant to be
elected. 

Jeff Bennett

PS Good luck everyone
at NAQT this weekend!

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0: Sat 12 Feb 2022 12:30:43 AM EST EST