Re: NAQT IFT packets [No spoilers]

I don't want to sound overly critical, but I just
want to clarify point [2] a little
further.

When I stated that "not all of the packets were of
'standard' length," I was not just referring to the
questions that were eliminated because of the player issue
you mentioned. At least one packet did not have a
bonus 26--the bonuses just stopped with number 25;
another packet ended with tossup 27, and yet another had
a missing tossup in the middle (14 jumped to 16, or
something similar).

--AEI

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0: Sat 12 Feb 2022 12:30:43 AM EST EST