Thanks to NAQT & more controversy [2/2]

As a postscript to the story, DCCHS was offered
the chance to play as an exhibition team, and they
begrudgingly accepted. They were understandably upset at not
being able to play for the Supernatural Ice Bowl (they
more than likely would have won), but the kids
themselves behaved in an admirable fashion. Comments were
made elsewhere, but I will decline to go
further.

At any rate, although NAQT rectified the situation
in an appropriate manner with the time constraints,
situations like this are entirely avoidable and I am
somewhat perplexed that safeguards have not been
established to prevent teams from playing on sets they have
already seen.

The root of the problem this year
may stem from the lack of a third winter Invitational
Set as in years past (why?) but the solution as I see
it is as follows:

First, absolutely totally
require teams hosting an NAQT tournament to provide at
the minimum a list of schools which are scheduled to
attend their tournament within one week of said
tournament. Results and such would be nice after the
tournament as well, but not as critical to this.

NAQT
should then compile a list by state of schools which
have played on which set and cross check the list with
subsequent tournament which use the set. This would not be
at all difficult. Why is this not being done? This
is basic. This is simple. To not do so invites a
team to try to twist the rules in their favor or to
inadvertantly cause what happened to us.

So in
conclusion, I'm not placing full blame on either DCCHS or
NAQT. Both did what needed to be done, and I was happy
to see DCCHS leave with smiles on their faces and
hope they come back to play at Battle of the 'Burgh
III. Again I thank NAQT for providing us the means of
rectifying a potentially devastating situation at such a
late hour before the tournament, and I hope this
serves as a wakeup call to more rigorously enforce their
question security.

As a final aside note and
question for others who deal with high school teams on a
regular basis -- what do you do with teams who correspond
through a team captain or player? I've dealt with them as
if they were a totally reliable contact as I would
with a collegiate team or coach, but this experience
with DCCHS has caused me to go back and question that
approach.

Thoughts, comments, etc welcome,
--
Eric P.
Steinhauser
President, Pitt Quiz Bowl
E_Steinhauser_at_...

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0: Sat 12 Feb 2022 12:30:43 AM EST EST