> Penn Bowl can be run with less effort than any > tournament and still rakes in large earnings. I have to agree with Dorri here. To make such a comment, whether said lightly or not, is completely asanine. A packet submission tournament in its own right is an incredible amount of work. A pack submission with over 60 teams is borderline insanity. Granted, I haven't been closely reading every single post, but I can't recall one person complaining of a repeat question. 20+ packs, 60 questions each, not one repeat. That alone amazes me, the way some of you look for errors like vultures seeking corpses. Penn runs the only 60+ team, pack submission tournament ever, anywhere, period. There's not one other person in this group who can stand up and say that they've ever done such a thing. If they really are doing such a terrible job, why do we all continue to throw $200 at them every single year? If Penn Bowl is such a joke, then how has it survived through ten incarnations? Speaking from the BU perspective, we go to Penn every year without fail, and will continue to. It's the only trip I can afford to take the whole team on budget-wise, and we all have a great time. We're never a title threat, I don't think we've even made a playoff. But we pay every year to have our questions not used, to play our 15 rounds and hit the road, because it's fun. Penn puts on a _quality_ event every year, and no one can argue with that with the amount of crap some people put out. You think you can do better? Shut up and do it. Cooch
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0: Sat 12 Feb 2022 12:30:43 AM EST EST