Nathan wrote<<What intrigues me is
the
naturalistic argument that ID is not science because it
does
not rely solely on
natural mechanisms.
In
contrast, one could assert that speciation must
have
occurred solely by natural
selection because no
other
secular explanation is possible. The problem with
this
line of thought is
what if hypothetically
the
IDer's are correct. Then it is the very definition
of
science which has
excluded a
truth.
>>
Science is an empirical pursuit. As such, it is great
at
figuring out empirical truths. If you think that
there
exists other truths, then science is limited, as it
is
totally useless in those regards. Science is a tool,
a
means, not the end.
Anthony, who
loathes those
dumbass logical positivists.