Re: Division II thoughts

>>
If I were a player who was
considering ACF, I might be disheartened by a game where I
had only heard of three of twenty tossup answers. The
circuit is developing to the point where what are
universally derided as easy answers by most players are still
going to flummox players fresh out of high school, and
where more and more study is needed to approach basic
levels of competency (imagine trying to learn golf by
starting out on a course with lots of water hazards and
hard shots - even if you don't finish last in a
tournament, you may find it too
frustrating).
<<

The thing here, though, is that ACF seems to have
fixed the undue obscurity problem, and now is the time
to bring new players in. Glancing over the finals
packet from this year's regionals, tossups featured such
answers as "Washington Irving", "the larynx", "Iran", and
"Marcus Garvey" -- and more answers perfectly usuable at
a high school tournament, albeit with easier
leadins of course.

The stereotype of ACF as
low-scoring and unenjoyable is no longer valid. Now is the
best time to start something like a Division II, or
just to market to less experienced teams in the normal
division. I know it feels less painful to be beaten to a
tossup on "Iran" halfway through ("hey, I know what that
is, better learn more clues") then to sit through a
tossup on "Evenings on a Farm Near Dikanka" and watch
someone who's memorized a list pick it off at the end
("why the hell does anyone know that?").

--M.W.

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0: Sat 12 Feb 2022 12:30:44 AM EST EST