Re: a little somethin' somethin'

Skip this if you don't care; if I wasn't
directly
involved, I'd skip it, too.

I'd like to preface this
by saying that Mr. Schluessel told me last night
that he was "paying me the courtesy of not responding
in public." I thank him for paying me that courtesy,
and I will return the favor with my own public
non-response.

Edmund Schluessel:
<<Earlier tonight, I told
one of the creators of the list that it offended me.
Granted, I was more upset than I should have been going
in; more than that, I was angry. But in the
discussion that followed, she rejected what I had to say out
of hand, so I'm bringing it here.>>


Obviously, I am the "one of the creators of the list" with
whom Mr. Schluessel spoke last night. This
conversation consisted of several hours of Mr. Schluessel
trying to bully me into posting an apology for the list,
and then finally, trying to make me apologize to him
personally to assuage his hurt feelings upon not being
included. This bullying was interspersed with attacks of an
extremely personal nature which I will not describe
here.

In this discussion, I realized that Mr. Schluessel
was of the opinion that everyone who was not on the
list was being insulted in some way. This is summarily
incorrect. Praise of a few does not imply reviling of the
many. If you take one thing from this message, please
understand that the list was posted entirely in
fun, with
no malicious intent. Anyone who found any malice in
the list put it there him/herself.

Finally,
Mr. Schluessel, in attempting to push me
toward an
apology, tried to get me to take
responsibility for his
reaction to the list. That is something I refuse to do. I
will take full responsibility for my words, and so
will my
collaborators; we wrote them and we'll
stand behind them. We will not, however, take
responsibility for that which we cannot control--the emotions of
others. If every writer censored herself because she was
afraid of reactions to her writing, we wouldn't have
much to read. 

Know this: the list was written,
as stated before, by some bored qb chyx (exactly
three, not four as someone else said) as an interesting,
amusing diversion, something that might give people a few
giggles. There was no harm intended to anyone in its
writing. FWIW, the list was chosen on the basis of people
whose company we enjoy, not on "clothes or muscles." I
never expected to have to stand up on my soapbox
and
defend a little (admittedly juvenile) giggling over a
few guys, and I certainly never expected to have to
invoke the Constitution in doing so. That said (and most
of my pompousness expended), I'm getting off it, and
neither I nor my collaborators will return to it
concerning this issue. If you want to take issue, you're
more than welcome to email us privately at
some_bored_qb_chyx_at_... --nothing posted on the club will get a
response.

Ever so respectfully,
a bored qb chyk speaking ex
cathedra

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0: Sat 12 Feb 2022 12:30:44 AM EST EST