Re: Falwell, et al. Part II

<<those who still insist that atheists
should be neither seen nor heard, >>

I
don't know who these people are. I challenge you to
find one. 

In the meantime, you've accused
Kristin of harboring sympathy for the Falwell end of
things. Simply put, that notion contradicts everything I,
at least, have ever heard her say; it also
contradicts evidence, now moot, that her orientation is
somewhat more malleable that you seem to have
assumed.

In other words, Matt, you didn't know what you were
talking about. But the problem is, and this is where it
ties back to the subject of intolerance -- you've
always claimed that your own beliefs were "objectively
correct" following from a "natural law," and without too
much digging either of us can find a half-dozen people
who've seen you say as much. And what's more, you've
never tolerated anyone else's position. Barely a day
goes by that you don't make a cheap shot somewhere
against at least one of your favorite bugaboos, be it
non-your economics, non-your politics, or the DePauw team;
you even boast of this, and again we can both find
half a dozen people who have seen you do as much.


So either you can be occasionally wrong, like most
human beings, or you can take up
hermitry.

Edmund

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0: Sat 12 Feb 2022 12:30:44 AM EST EST