Re: Important Question

The suspicious scores aren't too hard to find,
especially in light of the pseudonym of the anonymous
posting dude. I won't assume that there has been
cheating, but at least to consider the matter
hypothetically, I'd like to take what will probably be an
unpopular stance and urge leniency.

I've taught
English at a community college for some years now, and as
you might expect, one of the things we're supposed to
guard against like hungry Rottweilers is plagiarism.
There's a whole host of dire official consequences,
ranging from failure to expulsion to things nastier than
expulsion. Personally, I've never sent a student through all
that. I get plagiarized papers every semester, and it's
usually glaringly easy to recognize (e.g. a marginally
literate student who is suddenly using words like
'hermeneutic,' or my personal favourite, a student who uses
terms like "G-d" without knowing how obvious it is that
they've copied a book from the 1940s.) But they aren't
really conscious of the severity of what they're doing
-- they're in their opening couple of years of
college, they're in a sort of ethical daze -- they just
aren't really aware that what they're doing is so wrong.
Naturally, I give them back the paper and make them rewrite
it from scratch on a new topic, but I don't like it
to go beyond that.

True, you can't quite do
that for a hypothetical quizbowl competition, and the
analogy only goes so far anyway. But I have visions of
endless philippics of varying degrees of acerbity and/or
anality, plus endless calls for bans, fines, and various
official sanctions, and I really hope that the latter part
doesn't happen. If (either in this case or any other)
it's just a kid who is an otherwise nice enough guy
but is in that state of ... I don't know, temporary
ethical suspension, then I hope the situation doesn't go
to the level of "official sanctions." Certainly it
wouldn't happen again from the same guy, and I think some
simple taunting and perhaps glaring would suffice. And
again, let me emphasize that I'm talking purely in
hypotheticals -- I've got a teammate whose scores can shoot
from 15ppg to 60+ppg if I'm not in the way, and any
number of other factors could possibly lead to wide
scoring variations. Even the avoidance of a long drive
might do it, since the tournaments are supposedly at
the student's home school. And as someone just noted,
you can't discount Charlie's Question #6, the Ethanol
Coefficient.

Just offering what I suspect will be an opinion in the
minority --
--Raj Dhuwalia

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0: Sat 12 Feb 2022 12:30:45 AM EST EST