Lenny said:
>>Secondly, as an Econ
major, I was fairly upset by the complete lack of
economics at this tournament. I understand social sciences
aren't a big thing in college bowl (even though more and
more students are majoring in economics, psychology,
sociology, etc.), but to only see one tossup (on
indifference curves) in fourteen rounds of play is a bit of a
joke.
Comments, anyone? <<
It's the
same way I felt about the physics distribution. Math
was also underrepresented.
In general, most
ACF or mACF packets that I've heard have contained at
least 1 or more econ questions and quite a few general
social science questions (psych, anthro, etc.), so my
guess is that a tournament using an ACF-like
distribution is your best bet for some econ action.