Re: Quick Reflection on the 2002 ACF Reg

I do have three things to say about ACF
regionals, two of which I'll call queries, one a complaint.
The queries: If there's room in ACF for 1/1 trash a
round, why isn't there room for current events? The most
recent academia I recall from the ACF set was the
overthrow of Mobutu in 1997. Secondly, were 30-20-10s
actively edited out or did people just not submit them? I
don't remember any, and my teammates remember maybe
two.

The complaint: there were (especially in the Subash
pack) a few meta-QB references. The one which most
sticks in my mind is the bonus part on Heinrich Bll
which had a clue about Georgia Tech's former tournament
(and which, I admit, I knew only from that clue). If
ACF wants to remain a vibrant tournament, and
especially if it wants to draw a decent-sized field to
Nationals this year, it shouldn't give non-academic brownie
points like this to teams simply by virtue of those
teams' having been around forever. Meta-QB is a very
potent clique-enhancing ingredient; I personally don't
think it even has space in trash tournaments outside
explicitly masters'-focused events, and cut it out of
Beltway. The packets where such things came up would have
lost nothing if those clues'd been excised.


Edmund

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0: Sat 12 Feb 2022 12:30:45 AM EST EST