Re: Using google to weed out too-obscure answers

--- In quizbowl_at_y..., ZAMM_Phaedrus <no_reply_at_y...> wrote:
> --- In quizbowl_at_y..., fbush555 <no_reply_at_y...> wrote:
> > <500
> > Answer:  Henry Martyn Robert (do not accept _Roberts_)
> 
> Knowing what to search for is important. Searching for "Henry Martyn 
> Robert," quotations included gets 390 hits. Change the "y" to an "i" 
> to account for mispellings and you get an additional 41 hits. Search 
> for "Robert's Rules of Order," on the other hand, and you get about 
> 39,800 hits.

As two other examples from Fred's post.

[1] Searching for "Akhenaton" leads to dismal results because it's a 
typo; do a search on "Akhnaten [and] Glass," and you get over 1500 
results.

[2] Another problem comes from titles in translation. "Moses and 
Aaron" is an example. Searching for Schoenberg and "Moses and Aaron" 
indeed turns up only 221 hits; however, a search according to its 
original German title, "Moses und Aron," nets you an additional 1700 
hits.

So, again, knowing what to search for is key; however, poor hits on a 
subject may just mean that you're dealing with a typo. . . .

--AEI

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0: Sat 12 Feb 2022 12:30:46 AM EST EST