Difference between revisions of "1999 ICT"
(Created page with "The '''1999 ICT''' was the third Intercollegiate Championship Tournament sponsored by NAQT. The tournament was held April 10-11 on the campus of the University of Michigan in...") |
Matt Weiner (talk | contribs) |
||
| (4 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | The '''1999 | + | {{College Nat Tourneybox|Tournament Name = 1999 DI [[NAQT]] [[ICT]] |
| + | |champion = [[Chicago]] A | ||
| + | |second = [[Berkeley]] | ||
| + | |third = [[Michigan]] A | ||
| + | |fourth = [[Stanford]] | ||
| + | |scorer = [[Andrew Yaphe]] | ||
| + | |undergrad = [[Carleton]] A | ||
| + | |undergradsecond = [[Swarthmore]] | ||
| + | |site = [[University of Michigan]] (Ann Arbor, MI) | ||
| + | |field = 48 | ||
| + | |stats = [https://www.naqt.com/ict/1999/] | ||
| + | }} | ||
| + | The '''1999 NAQT Intercollegiate Championship Tournament''' was the third [[ICT]] and was held April 10-11, 1999 on the campus of the [[University of Michigan]] in Ann Arbor, MI. | ||
| − | In 1999, NAQT reported two individual averages: IPPG (individual points-per-game) and PCbPG (Points Contributed-per-Game). The latter stat attempted to adjust the former for bonuses, and assess a higher penalty to the average for negs. Final individual rankings were based on the PCbPG number | + | In 1999, NAQT reported two individual averages: IPPG (individual points-per-game) and PCbPG (Points Contributed-per-Game). The latter stat attempted to adjust the former for bonuses, and assess a higher penalty to the average for negs. Final individual rankings were based on the PCbPG number. The below listing includes the top five players based on IPPG, as this is likely the closer value to [[PP20TH]] that is used today. As the "tossups heard" statistic is not preserved in the surviving stats, exactly determining actual scoring when correcting for number of questions heard in timed games is no longer possible. |
==D I== | ==D I== | ||
| Line 28: | Line 40: | ||
|} | |} | ||
| − | Additionally, three teams qualified as undergraduate teams. [[Carleton|Carleton A]], [[Swarthmore]], and [[Texas]] finished 1-3, respectively, while finishing 8th, 14th, and 15th in DI. | + | Additionally, three teams qualified as undergraduate teams. [[Carleton College|Carleton College A]], [[Swarthmore]], and [[Texas]] finished 1-3, respectively, while finishing 8th, 14th, and 15th in DI. |
| Line 62: | Line 74: | ||
==D II== | ==D II== | ||
| − | The top 5 teams in D | + | The top 5 teams in D II: |
{|class=wikitable style=text-align:center; | {|class=wikitable style=text-align:center; | ||
| Line 76: | Line 88: | ||
|- | |- | ||
|3 | |3 | ||
| − | |[[Carleton]] | + | |[[Carleton College]] |
|- | |- | ||
|4 | |4 | ||
| Line 118: | Line 130: | ||
==External Links== | ==External Links== | ||
*[https://www.naqt.com/stats/tournament-teams.jsp?tournament_id=2942 Final Team Rankings] | *[https://www.naqt.com/stats/tournament-teams.jsp?tournament_id=2942 Final Team Rankings] | ||
| − | *[https://www.naqt.com/Results/1999-ict-stats.html Individual Stats] | + | *[https://web.archive.org/web/20010419203626/https://www.naqt.com/Results/1999-ict-stats.html Individual Stats] |
Latest revision as of 12:52, 17 June 2026
| ||
| Champion | Chicago A | |
| Runner-up | Berkeley | |
| Third | Michigan A | |
| Fourth | Stanford | |
| High scorer | Andrew Yaphe | |
| Undergrad Champion | Carleton A | |
| Undergrad Runner-up | Swarthmore | |
| Site | University of Michigan (Ann Arbor, MI) | |
| Field | 48 | |
| Stats | [1] | |
The 1999 NAQT Intercollegiate Championship Tournament was the third ICT and was held April 10-11, 1999 on the campus of the University of Michigan in Ann Arbor, MI.
In 1999, NAQT reported two individual averages: IPPG (individual points-per-game) and PCbPG (Points Contributed-per-Game). The latter stat attempted to adjust the former for bonuses, and assess a higher penalty to the average for negs. Final individual rankings were based on the PCbPG number. The below listing includes the top five players based on IPPG, as this is likely the closer value to PP20TH that is used today. As the "tossups heard" statistic is not preserved in the surviving stats, exactly determining actual scoring when correcting for number of questions heard in timed games is no longer possible.
D I
The top 5 teams in D I:
| PLACE | SCHOOL |
|---|---|
| 1 | Chicago A |
| 2 | California, Berkeley |
| 3 | Michigan A |
| 4 | Stanford |
| 5 | Maryland A |
Additionally, three teams qualified as undergraduate teams. Carleton College A, Swarthmore, and Texas finished 1-3, respectively, while finishing 8th, 14th, and 15th in DI.
The Top 5 individuals:
| PLAYER | SCHOOL | STATLINE |
|---|---|---|
| Andrew Yaphe | Chicago A | 39-88-23-96.43 |
| Ian Bayley | Oxford | 15-70-18-55.67 |
| John Kenney | Virginia | 12-70-10-55.33 |
| Steven Watchorn | Wisconsin | 6-83-19-55.00 |
| Matt Zielenski | Ohio Wesleyan | 12-64-13-50.33 |
D II
The top 5 teams in D II:
| PLACE | SCHOOL |
|---|---|
| 1 | Princeton |
| 2 | Chicago |
| 3 | Carleton College |
| 4 | Harvard |
| 5 | Georgia |
The Top 5 individuals:
| PLAYER | SCHOOL | STATLINE |
|---|---|---|
| Jeff Hoppes | Princeton | 14-73-7-60.33 |
| Ian Jeffries | Furman | 7-56-14-42.50 |
| Mike Chiswick-Patterson | Princeton | 6-57-11-40.33 |
| Sahir Islam | Harvard | 4-58-16-40.00 |
| Steve Traicoff | Michigan | 6-50-14-38.52 |
External Links
| ||
| | ||