Difference between revisions of "2019 NHBB Online"
m |
|||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
==Aftermath and "scandal"== | ==Aftermath and "scandal"== | ||
| − | The tournament had consistently promoted itself as a [[housewrite]]. However,as documented on [http://hsquizbowl.org/forums/viewtopic.php?f=104&t=22615&p=357297&hilit=Housewrite#p35729 this thread], after the tournament's preliminary stages had concluded and packets had been uploaded online, numerous members of the QB community pointed out that many of the tossups used in the tournament were either directly copied from, or extremely similar to, questions used in past tournaments written by other quizbowl organizations, even though it admitted to not being affiliated in any way with either NHBB or International Academic Competitions (IAC). Some also pointed out that this might potentially constitute copyright infringement. This was likely the result of a last-minute rush to 'fill out' incomplete packets that were missing a large number of questions. Some posters on the above thread also said they believed Singh to be too inexperienced to be TD'ing a tournament, but that he still "should have known better". | + | The tournament had consistently promoted itself as a [[housewrite]]. However, as documented on [http://hsquizbowl.org/forums/viewtopic.php?f=104&t=22615&p=357297&hilit=Housewrite#p35729 this thread], after the tournament's preliminary stages had concluded and packets had been uploaded online, numerous members of the QB community pointed out that many of the tossups used in the tournament were either directly copied from, or extremely similar to, questions used in past tournaments written by other quizbowl organizations, even though it admitted to not being affiliated in any way with either NHBB or International Academic Competitions (IAC). Some also pointed out that this might potentially constitute copyright infringement. This was likely the result of a last-minute rush to 'fill out' incomplete packets that were missing a large number of questions. Some posters on the above thread also said they believed Singh to be too inexperienced to be TD'ing a tournament, but that he still "should have known better". |
Fortunately, Singh eventually later apologized for his errors. | Fortunately, Singh eventually later apologized for his errors. | ||
Revision as of 16:03, 10 May 2019
- See also: Question recycling
The 2019 "NHBB" Discord Tournament was an online history bee-style tournament held during April 2019 on Discord servers. The brainchild of 8th grade Laurel Springs NHB player Ameya Singh, the tournament was won by Sam Brochin in a small field. Besides being called a logistical mess by some people involved, the event attracted controversy after it was revealed that a number of questions it used were more or less plagiarized from quizDB and/or past NHBB events, resulting in a minor scandal.
Aftermath and "scandal"
The tournament had consistently promoted itself as a housewrite. However, as documented on this thread, after the tournament's preliminary stages had concluded and packets had been uploaded online, numerous members of the QB community pointed out that many of the tossups used in the tournament were either directly copied from, or extremely similar to, questions used in past tournaments written by other quizbowl organizations, even though it admitted to not being affiliated in any way with either NHBB or International Academic Competitions (IAC). Some also pointed out that this might potentially constitute copyright infringement. This was likely the result of a last-minute rush to 'fill out' incomplete packets that were missing a large number of questions. Some posters on the above thread also said they believed Singh to be too inexperienced to be TD'ing a tournament, but that he still "should have known better".
Fortunately, Singh eventually later apologized for his errors.
Packets used
Samples from the prelims include: