Re: Does single elimination suck?

The MickMan uses this argument:

To borrow
from sports inaccurately, the NCAA system allows a
7-21 George Mason squad to win the national title. The
College Football system does not allow a 3-8 Rice squad
to win the National Title.

Yes, but the NCAA
system allows all 300+ teams to be alive for all the
games, while the College Football system keeps 12-0
Marshall from even getting a prayer at a championship from
the opening kickoff.

In fact, I would see no
problem with an all-in playoff system. Make EVERY GAME
COUNT! Allow each team 1 extra game and in the process,
generate excitement all the way through Saturday
night.

But I'm not too serious about that. Chris Rooney's
heart can start beating again. :)

I do, however,
wish to tell the teams who lost early on... SHUT UP
ALREADY!! You say the best teams lost in the first round of
the tournament. Well, if they're "the best teams",
why did they lose? Duh.

And if they say
"because the packet sucked" or "because the moderator was
bad" or "because boni didn't break our way"... well,
they can be bitter about it, but guess what, crap
happens. In the end, remember that IT'S ONE GAME and no
one really cares. Will putting down "Penn Bowl 2000
Champions" on your resume mean anything to anybody? Likely
not.

So in the end, if the single-elim is so odious that
it makes getting 14 games over two days and meeting
people who were previously only an email address just
not worth it, then take your clocks and buzzers and
stay at home. I'll be in Philly, enjoying
myself.

Andy Goss
(speaking only as Andy Goss)

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0: Sat 12 Feb 2022 12:30:42 AM EST EST