Re: Does single elimination suck?

In the RR, Illinois, Michigan and Maryland played
on 13 common rounds. On those rounds, they compiled
a record of 39-0.

Given an average margin of
victory and standard deviation, we could predict the
likelihood that all three would lose on the same
round.

That probability would have to be considerably less
than 1% or even 0.01%. Then consider that Chicago A
(w. Andrew Yaphe would have also gone undefeated in
the RR and lost on that round. The tournament
occurrence was so statistically impossible that it cannot
hardly have been caused by a Random
Variation.

Penn created and set up a situation where the
consensus #1-4 teams in the nation would go undefeated in
the RR and ALL lose an opening playoff round to teams
well outside the top ten, and with less than 10% of
the votes that the #1-4 teams recieved in QB
polls.

Why did Penn select that round for the first playoffs
when it could have been in the RR. Because, if the
upsets occurred in the RR, the #1-4 teams could still
win the tourney and Penn didn't want those schools to
win. Either that, or the PB staff was simply too
incompetent to furnish four playoff rounds that were of
reasonable similarity in form and content to the 15 RR
packets.

After the first playoff round, the tournament reverted
to expected form with the favorites advancing in
most cases with some minor upsets. (#10 Yale defeating
#7 Princeton) The other finalist was #19 Cornell,
the highest seed in its half of the draw after the #1
seeds were removed.

It is not coincidental that
all 3 of the Nation's top 4 in attendance lost on
that round - to teams the others had decimated in the
RR. It was an "upset special" placed in that position
by the PB9 staff to favor the #4 seeds over the #1's
and maximize the likelihood of defeat. Having read
the paacket in advance, seeing the preliminary
statistics, and seeing the playoff pairings, only a fool
would have bet on any of the #1 seeds to survuve the
first round.

Want Chicago lose. Make literature
Ph.D candidate Andrew Yaphe play on a round where all
the literature questions are "children's lit" - A.A.
Milne and the Chocolate War. Sadly for the PB9 staff,
Mr. Yaphe did not go and Duke let them down against
Princeton, thus preventing a first- round sweep of
undefeated teams.

Well. There's always next year.

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0: Sat 12 Feb 2022 12:30:42 AM EST EST