Re: ACF Nationals -- quick results

I'm pretty sure Maryland can claim 12th place, fwiw. 

I really can't make any conclusions until the stats come out, but 
based on what I know of our stats, I think the bonuses overall may 
have been a bit too difficult.  We were the average team of the 
tournament, in that we went 7-7.  Despite this, no team scored more 
than 280 points against us, and no team beat us by more than 100... 
and we were in the evil bracket, where we played Michigan A, 
Berkeley, and Yale.  The combined scores of my team and that of our 
opponents were right around 300 per game.  If this is what average 
combined scores at ACF Nationals have been in the past, then that's 
fine... but there seemed to be a good number of bonuses where neither 
team had a clue.  

I'll hold off on most substantive comments for now, but I will say 
that I enjoyed Kentucky, Harvard, and Nathan's packets; they were of 
high quality and very fair (Nathan's bonus on Mandy Moore songs 
excluded - ick ;-)). 

In any case, it was an enjoyable tournament overall.  Congratulations 
to Berkeley for winning what appears to have been one of the most 
closely contested ACF Nationals ever; Michigan and Kentucky were 
certainly championship caliber as well.

-Adam

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0: Sat 12 Feb 2022 12:30:47 AM EST EST