Re: ACF Nationals -- quick results

--- In quizbowl_at_yahoogroups.com, thefool75 <no_reply_at_y...> wrote:

> The only real screwups--the bracketing was lopsided--I think that 
was 
> obvious going in and is confirmed in the results...perhaps use 
bonus 
> conversion from regionals as a way to prevent this?  The A bracket 
> was clearly stronger from top to bottom--even more so at the 
bottom 
> end...
> 

I'm not sure how the conclusion that the A bracket was stronger from 
top to bottom can be drawn based on the information (?) presented.  
There was clearly a huge gap between 3rd and 4th overall, and the A 
bracket had the top 2 teams, but the B bracket teams beat Yale and 
Indiana to claim spots 3-6.  Michigan B's early departure may have 
skewed the results of the middle playoff bracket somewhat (they tied 
with Harvard and Vanderbilt for 5th after the initial round robin).

FWIW, I agree with Nathan that the questions were extremely good and 
very consistent.  There were a few things that probably should have 
included notes to prompt on x until y is read, etc., but overall the 
packets were enjoyable, relevant, and relatively painless to play 
on.  RSBhan deserves his apotheosis.  

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0: Sat 12 Feb 2022 12:30:47 AM EST EST