Re: What's up with NAQT ICT Invitations

Hi,

I just wanted to restate something I must not have stated clearly in
an earlier post.  The autobids for which I'd like to see some sort of
minimum S-value (or whatever--some measure of performance compared to
the total field) imposed to guarantee a bid were not the host
autobids, just the D1 winner, undergrad winner, and D2 winner autobids.  

I completely understand the purpose of the host bid as an incentive
for hosting, and I think it would be difficult for NAQT to find enough
competent SCT hosts without offering it.  When I mentioned SFU in an
earlier post, it was because I had missed the fact that they qualified
with their host bid and had thought that their D2 team's performance
qualified them.  

Also, with regard to Stan's post, I understand your frustration, but
this seems to happen almost every year (see Princeton and Maryland at
the 2001 SCT).  The last time I recall the balance of components in
the S-value being explained (in this post:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/quizbowl/message/3920), it was made
clear that the weight of a team's win-loss record was low compared to
ppth.  I do recall hearing that NAQT ensures that teams from lower
brackets don't receive bids ahead of teams in the same sectional from
a higher bracket, but within a bracket, win-loss record probably
counts for fairly little.  

Susan

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0: Sat 12 Feb 2022 12:30:48 AM EST EST