Re: Outline NAQT ICT selection process (

Eric Hillemann writes:

<<[Two
spots--33 and 34 in the Division I field this year--are
being offered to British teams based upon results of
the British NAQT
championships.]>>

OK.

<<4. Overall champions at an IFT who were unable to
attend an SCT because none were held within 450 miles of
their school.
5. Undergraduate champions at an IFT
who were unable to attend an SCT because none were
held within 450 miles of their
school.>>

As near as I can tell, neither of these are
applicable.

<<6. Overall champions at an IFT who have not already
been invited, whether or not they attended an
SCT.>>

There are three teams (Oklahoma, Florida, and Penn
State) that won an IFT that didn't get an auto-bid at an
SCT.

<<7. Undergraduate champions at an IFT who have not
already been invited, whether or not they attended an
SCT.>>

There are three IFT undergrad champions (Pittsburgh,
WUSTL, and Oklahoma B) who did not earn auto-bids this
weekend.

<<8. Overall 2nd-place teams at an IFT who were unable
to attend an SCT because none were held within 450
miles of their school.>>

No team qualifies
under this criterion.

<<Invitations are
now issued to any overall 2nd-place teams at an IFT
who have not already been invited, whether or not
they attended an SCT.>>

None of the six
teams left under this criterion (Princeton B, Michigan
"B", Illinois, Texas A&M, Florida State, and Caltech;
Pittsburgh gets in under (5) above) have automatic
bids.

******************************

I guess the main question now is this: with no
fewer than 33 teams apparently "guaranteed" DivI bids
at some point in the selection process, how many
teams will end up missing out primarily because of
lousy geography?

--STI

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0: Sat 12 Feb 2022 12:30:43 AM EST EST