Re: NAQT 2002 ICT Division I finals & tiebreak scores

If playing this game made you that unhappy, and if it was so 
insignificant, couldn't you have just forfeited and enjoyed your 
lunch?

--Rick

--- In quizbowl_at_y..., cooterchekov <no_reply_at_y...> wrote:
> > Georgia 215, GWU 190
> 
> I should note here that this game had *no* significance. 
> 
> Georgia and GW had equal records coming out of the round-robin (4-
7) 
> and GW had just won head-to-head. This made GW and Georgia 9th and 
> 10th (in some order), putting them both in the 5th flight. 
> 
> All this particular playoff game did was determine the order in 
which 
> Georgia and GW faced the other 5th-flight teams. However, since we 
> both saw the same teams in different orders, and all packets are 
> theoretically equal, winning this game was neither more or less 
> desirable (in and of itself) than losing the game.
> 
> In other words, the decision could have just as well been made with 
a 
> coin flip. Furthermore, this was the case going into that round.
> 
> In other words, we had to sit around and play a game that had no 
> meaning for half an hour while other teams went to lunch.
> 
> And we were hungry.
> 
> Edmund

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0: Sat 12 Feb 2022 12:30:45 AM EST EST