Difference between revisions of "Arthur's Paradox"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(→Exceptions: found another) |
Kevin Wang (talk | contribs) |
||
| (One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| + | <onlyinclude> | ||
'''Arthur's Paradox''' is an observation about quizbowl made by [[Bruce Arthur]]. It states that while quizbowl players adore concepts that are doubly-, triply-, or otherwise poly-eponymous, virtually no concepts created by quizbowl players to describe quizbowl are poly-eponymous. | '''Arthur's Paradox''' is an observation about quizbowl made by [[Bruce Arthur]]. It states that while quizbowl players adore concepts that are doubly-, triply-, or otherwise poly-eponymous, virtually no concepts created by quizbowl players to describe quizbowl are poly-eponymous. | ||
| − | + | </onlyinclude> | |
==Examples== | ==Examples== | ||
Examples of mono-eponymous concepts include: | Examples of mono-eponymous concepts include: | ||
| Line 11: | Line 12: | ||
Ironically, Arthur's Paradox is also an example. | Ironically, Arthur's Paradox is also an example. | ||
| + | |||
| + | See also [[:Category:Eponymous laws]]. | ||
==Exceptions== | ==Exceptions== | ||
Latest revision as of 09:27, 25 May 2021
Arthur's Paradox is an observation about quizbowl made by Bruce Arthur. It states that while quizbowl players adore concepts that are doubly-, triply-, or otherwise poly-eponymous, virtually no concepts created by quizbowl players to describe quizbowl are poly-eponymous.
Examples
Examples of mono-eponymous concepts include:
Ironically, Arthur's Paradox is also an example.
See also Category:Eponymous laws.
Exceptions
Noted exceptions to Arthur's Paradox include: