Andy Watkins

Andy Watkins
Noted subjects	Science
Current college	Harvard (2008-)
Past colleges	None
High school	Shady Side (2003-2007)
Stats	HDWhite • NAQT

"Crazy" Andy Watkins is a quizbowl player for Harvard. He is much beloved by quizbowl for writing seventy million questions over the past twelve months. He also has a reputation for posting, occasionally incomprehensibly, a lot on hsquizbowl.org. He was the leading scorer on the Harvard B/D2 team at both the NAQT ICT and ACF Nationals in his freshman year. He is currently the President of the Harvard College Bowl Team.

High School Career

Andy was on a Shady Side team that impressed many for its ambition when it attended the 2006 ECSO; this was before the time when elite high school players became regular attendees at college-level events.

Editing Career

Andy was a member of the editorial staff for the following tournaments:

• Harvard Fall Tournament (several incarnations)
• Harvard T-Party 2008 and 2010
• Harvard International 1 and 2
• VETO
• FIST

In addition, Andy helped finish the chemistry for [[Lederberg Memorial Science]Lederberg]] based on answers already selected.

Controversial philosophy

Andy has been accused of platonic idealism for reasons unclear.

Andy's philosophy on studying for quizbowl is that you need to study really obscure things to beat good players to good questions. Therefore, much of his knowledge base is actually stuff that rarely comes up. This has also led to Andy's reputation as among the worst judges of difficulty appropriateness among active writers of good questions.

(The above is better put forth as "you need to spend a lot of time learning early clues, even at the expense of spending as much time learning late clues," which sounds a lot less silly and better resembles his original exposition of this principle.)

(Andy does, however, believe that having written too-hard high school questions, reasonable regular difficulty questions, and too-hard nationals-level questions has given him better canon sense and despite his bizarre and mostly ineffective studying strategies, he'll be able to write good questions for future tournaments: see for example his difficulty-appropriate material for HAVOC.)