Difference between revisions of "NASAT"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Mike Sorice (talk | contribs) (Changed proprietorship to IQBT.) |
Mike Sorice (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 109: | Line 109: | ||
| 2019 | | 2019 | ||
| [[Team Illinois|Illinois A]] ([[Rockford Auburn]], [[IMSA]], [[Stevenson]], [[University of Illinois Lab]]) | | [[Team Illinois|Illinois A]] ([[Rockford Auburn]], [[IMSA]], [[Stevenson]], [[University of Illinois Lab]]) | ||
| − | | Ohio ([[Beavercreek]], [[Miami Valley School|Miami Valley]], [[Ottawa Hills]], [[Solon]]) | + | | Ohio A ([[Beavercreek]], [[Miami Valley School|Miami Valley]], [[Ottawa Hills]], [[Solon]]) |
| Texas ([[LASA]], [[Ronald_Reagan|San Antonio Reagan]], [[Strake Jesuit]], [[Katy Taylor]]) | | Texas ([[LASA]], [[Ronald_Reagan|San Antonio Reagan]], [[Strake Jesuit]], [[Katy Taylor]]) | ||
| New Jersey ([[High Tech]], [[Millburn]]) | | New Jersey ([[High Tech]], [[Millburn]]) | ||
Revision as of 18:43, 23 June 2019
The National All-Star Academic Tournament (NASAT) is run by International Quiz Bowl Tournaments, having been run by High School Academic Pyramid Questions until 2018. It is a national tournament for state all-star teams, meaning that only one team from each state or Canadian province is allowed to enter in the tournament. The first occurrence of this tournament was held June 12-13, 2010 at Vanderbilt and was well-received.
NASAT is not the first tournament to use state all-star teams, since that is done by PAC/NTAE. However, it is the first tournament using all-star teams to feature pyramidal questions and one-on-one matches.
In 2016, the field was opened to B teams.
Results by year
Results by team
| State | 2010 | 2011 | 2012 | 2013 | 2014 | 2015 | 2016 | 2017 | 2018 | Played | Wins | Top 2s | Top 3s | Top 4s |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alabama | 12 | 14 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Arizona | 13 | 1 | ||||||||||||
| California | 7 | 4 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 4 | 3 | 9 | 2 | 3 | 6 | 8 |
| China | 25 | 1 | ||||||||||||
| Delaware | 15 | 6 | 2 | |||||||||||
| District of Columbia | 6 | 7 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Florida | 9 | 22 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Georgia | 5 | 4 | 11 | 13 | 11 | 4 | 5 | 22 | 8 | 2 | ||||
| Illinois | 3 | 2 | 2 | 6 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 9 | 3 | 6 | 8 | 8 |
| Indiana | 13 | 12 | 12 | 3 | ||||||||||
| Kentucky | 10 | 8 | 11 | 7 | 11 | 8 | 9 | 21 | 23 | 9 | ||||
| Maryland | 6 | 5 | 6 | 11 | 8 | 5 | ||||||||
| Massachusetts | 16 | 1 | ||||||||||||
| Michigan | 5 | 17 | 4 | 13 | 18 | 5 | 1 | |||||||
| Minnesota | 12 | 13 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Missouri | 12 | 9 | 6 | 1 | 8 | 10 | 9 | 6 | 6 | 9 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| New Hampshire | 15 | 1 | ||||||||||||
| New Jersey | 10 | 8 | 10 | 4 | 5 | 16 | 6 | 1 | ||||||
| New York | 9 | 3 | 9 | 14 | 6 | 2 | t-10th | 7 | 1 | 2 | 2 | |||
| Nevada | 27 | 1 | ||||||||||||
| North Carolina | 7 | 15 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Ohio | 8 | 3 | 9 | 4 | 7 | 7 | 3 | 7 | 3 | 9 | 3 | 4 | ||
| Oklahoma | 14 | 12 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Pennsylvania | 1 | 9 | 5 | 9 | 5 | 5 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | ||||
| South Carolina | 2 | 12 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | ||||||||
| Tennessee | 11 | 10 | 6 | 7 | 4 | |||||||||
| Texas | 5 | 1 | 5 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 6 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 4 | |||
| Vermont | 16 | 1 | ||||||||||||
| Virginia | 4 | 10 | 8 | 6 | 2 | 8 | 2 | 7 | 2 | 2 | 3 |
NOTE: This table is through 2018.