Difference between revisions of "List of science writers and editors"

From QBWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(There are tons of people to add but here's a brief start)
m (what should be the criteria to add names to this list?)
 
Line 1: Line 1:
By popular demand, a list of people who are capable of [[editing]] [[science]].  This list is by no means comprehensive, nor are these people necessarily free to edit.  Furthermore, someone being placed in one section doesn't mean s/he is incapable of editing other science subjects (for example, [[Matt Keller]] edited all of the science for [[ACF Regionals]] to critical acclaim).
+
By popular demand, a list of people who are capable of [[editing]] [[science]].  This list is by no means comprehensive, nor are these people necessarily free to edit.  Furthermore, someone being placed in one section doesn't mean they are incapable of editing other science subjects (for example, [[Matt Keller]] edited all of the science for [[ACF Regionals]] to critical acclaim).
  
 
For the purposes of this list, one is considered '''Retired''' if they have not written or edited science in a number of years - several of these people are still active in the [[community]], with some still playing [[open]] sets. By contrast, '''Active''' people are still working on sets.
 
For the purposes of this list, one is considered '''Retired''' if they have not written or edited science in a number of years - several of these people are still active in the [[community]], with some still playing [[open]] sets. By contrast, '''Active''' people are still working on sets.

Latest revision as of 10:51, 22 July 2022

By popular demand, a list of people who are capable of editing science. This list is by no means comprehensive, nor are these people necessarily free to edit. Furthermore, someone being placed in one section doesn't mean they are incapable of editing other science subjects (for example, Matt Keller edited all of the science for ACF Regionals to critical acclaim).

For the purposes of this list, one is considered Retired if they have not written or edited science in a number of years - several of these people are still active in the community, with some still playing open sets. By contrast, Active people are still working on sets.

Biology and Chemistry

Retired

Active

Physics

Retired

Active

Computer Science

Retired

Active

Mathematics

Retired

Active

Earth Science

Retired

Active